Native Doctor to die by hanging for kidnapping in Akwa Ibom
By Dennis Udoma, Uyo
A native doctor, Sunday George Andrew alias Sunday Akpan Adede is to die by hanging, following the judgement handed down by the State High Court sitting in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State capital today (Friday).
The judgement was prevailed against him for kidnapping two brothers; Chief Israel Efefiong Utit and Pastor Bassey Utit in 2015.
Andrew, a native of Ikono Local Government Area of the State, is said to have conspired with others now at large to commit the offence at Nkemba Street, Uyo on November 29, 2015 and harboured the victims in his shrine at Ikot Enua, Ikono demanding N50m ransom.
The convicted native doctor was standing trial with the first defendant, Ibe Francis Emeka on a six-count charge for conspiracy, kidnapping and armed robbery in which he was found guilty, while the Court discharged and acquitted Emeka over failure of the prosecution to prove the ingredients of kidnapping, armed robbery and conspiracy against him.
Emeka, a native of Abia State said that, he was invited to Uyo by his friend, “Papa” only to be taken to a drinking joint at Nkemba Street in company of one Ukeme Amos alias “Bishop” the leader of the gang and Jude Ihemekwa alias “Method” who is currently undergoing trial for another case of kidnapping in Uyo.
He said, while at Nkemba Street, the gang saw a black Toyota Corolla car and double crossed it and before he could know, “Bishop” and “Papa” dragged the two brothers out of their car to another car and instructed him to go to the front seat while “Bishop” and the victims were kept at the back of the car and “Papa” took the victims’ car away.
In a one hour judgment on Friday, the trial judge, Justice Gabriel Ette described Ibe Francis Emeka as “an innocent and a victim who happened to be in the company of wrong persons, in the wrong place and at the wrong time by inadvertence” adding that, “the only difference between him and the other victims was that no ransom was placed on his head.”
“He was, like the main victims, put in the same room with them, that piece of evidence was not debunked. He was precluded from leaving the camp hence his decision to escape with the victims.
“If he was a kidnapper, his access and exit would not have been restricted or curtailed as shown in evidence. The real kidnappers left the camp, he was not allowed the freedom of movement. That is why I see him as an innocent victim too.” Justice Ette held.
The Court also noted that, “the first defendant initiated the escape plan and the victims in their extra Judicial statements corroborated the fact”arguing that, “if the first defendant came from Aba to Uyo to make money through kidnapping as alleged by the prosecution, why then was he the one who initiated and aided the escape of the victims.”
Justice Ette said, “it is in evidence that the first defendant did not run away upon their escape, but followed the victims to their residence, got refreshed, had his bath and stayed behind with them till the DSS showed up.
“Even in the house of the victims and in the presence of the DSS personnel, “Papa” text the first defendant and vowed to kill him for aiding the escape of the victims and he showed the text to his hosts who showed to the DSS personnel.
“If these does not paint a different picture of the person of the first defendant, then it will be a surprise to me. I had the opportunity of watching the demeanor of the first defendant in Court, he didn’t come across to me as a hardened criminal. He was sincere in his testimony.” Justice Ette further stated.
“He became like Jonathan in the camp of King Saul; his father who had no reason to die but for filial considerations.
“The lesson here is that; do not be found an innocent man in the camp of the wrong men. I advise him to be careful with those he calls friends. Unlike Jonathan, Ibe Francis Emeka won’t die, at least not in my hands. Today, I have the honour of breaking the chains of bondage that held him down for 10 years in the custodial center. I declare him not guilty indeed of the six counts charge and free him accordingly”, Justice Ette held.
